I'm pretty sure that I learned far more
on my prac than the students I was teaching. Some of it will stand me
in good stead for my next prac, and for when I am a fully-qualified
teacher. Some of it was very disappointing and disallusioning.
One of the first things I learned was
that my supervising teacher no longer wanted to be a teacher, but was
sticking with it for a few more years, while her youngest child
finishes high school. Another teacher in our staff room was only
staying with teaching to boost his superannuation before he retired.
Yet another teacher didn't speak to me during my four weeks sitting
at the desk next to him, and seemed to dislike all students and the
teaching of them. There were frequent discussions in there about
students being "not very bright" and "unteachable",
including one entire year. No effort was put in to teaching these
students, as it was deemed to be a waste of effort.
However, imaginative teaching was
hampered by the Head of Department's (HOD) micromanaging of all unit
plans, which, at least in the case of the Year 10 SOSE1
class I taught, ensured that the subject matter was kept as dull as
possible, and the teaching methods limited to writing things on the
whiteboard for the students to write down into workbooks.
The school did have a course of
professional development (PD) for preservice teachers (student/prac
teachers), which included information on their preferred teaching
strategy, "Dimensions of Learning" (DOL). This placed great
emphasis on teaching the students to think for themselves, and also
to behave appropriately, and take responsibility for themselves and
their actions.
When I brought up the subject of DOL,
and teaching students to think with regards to the year 10s, I was
told not to bother trying to get them to think, as it was now "too
late" for them. I could possibly try it with the Year 9
Extension English I was teaching, but this group of "not very
bright" Year 10 students was beyond hope. However, if they're
all being taught in a very dull, unimaginitive way, by teachers who
put no effort into teaching them, I don't think it's surprising that
the students are not engaging, let alone excelling.
I found that many of the students were
actually very bright, but bored witless. One girl, who I knew to be
articulate and knowlegeable, spent one 70-minute lesson doing nothing
but writing "this is booooooring" in her workbook. I
sympathised with her, but it wasn't in my power to make it any less
boring. Unfortunately for this student (and the three others who
didn't write anything that lesson), my supervising teacher reported
them for "not participating".
I found that attempting to motivate
unmotivated students was exceptionally difficult. The Year 10 SOSE
class had absolutely no intrinsic motiviation, and I struggled to
find any extrinsic motivation for them. I was told that none of them
wanted to do SOSE next year, and therefore, their interest was zero.
They feel no need to work on something just for the sake of learning
something new or doing a good job. If they get no immediate use or
enjoyment out of it, it holds no interest and they largely refuse to
participate in any meaningful way.
My supervising teacher dissuaded me
from trying to do anything but dictate information for them to enter
into their workbooks. This particular class was deemed too disruptive
and easily distracted to attempt any group work, or anything other
than sitting down and copying information from the board into their
books (and sometimes they didn't even do that). I did get them to do
a couple of small writing tasks, but that was about it, outside of
the workbooks. My teacher also felt that doing group work with a
class like that would be an attempt at "winning over" the
students, and that the students would respond to it by laughing at
the teacher, and losing all respect for him/her.
If I was writing a unit/lesson plan on
this for uni, it would include all kinds of collaborative learning
activities, and of course no pure transmission of info. Real life was
completely different.
I have learned that it's very difficult
to learn the names of all the students in each class. After four
weeks of teaching them, I still didn't know all their names, and I
feel it as a particular failure on my part. However, in the
pre-service teachers' PD during my last week, I was given an
excellent technique for not only learning all of their names very
quickly, but also how to manage some of their classroom behaviour. By
bringing the students into the class slowly, and arranging them in
alphabetical order around the class, some groups and cliques will be
separated, and having them keep the same seats for all classes, I
will be able to practice their names in order. I also know that I can
request a class roll, so that I have a list of the students' names on
hand. I will definitely be doing this in my next prac.
I will also ask to have all the
"special needs" students identified to me, so that I can be
prepared to meet their needs. I was three weeks into teaching the
Year 10s when I found out that there were at least three students
with some degree of ASD.
In this prac, I didn't feel that I
could take up time in the first lesson of each class to set ground
rules and discuss my class rules, but I have since been advised that
it's strongly advised that we do that, and if our supervising teacher
isn't supportive of this, to discuss it with the prac co-ordinator.
Before my next prac I will have devised my own set of class
guidelines, and have them printed and ready to go up on the walls in
the class rooms that I am using.
In the class rooms themselves, I had a
difficult time getting around the room, and being able to access all
of the students. On the one occasion I moved the desks (for group
work), my supervising teacher afterwards told me that I shouldn't ask
the students to help me, and that it takes too long to move and then
move back the furniture, so it's not really practical. I had to make
to with the arrangements of the rooms, despite the difficulties it
presented, as the HOD was unwilling to have the desks rearranged. It
was pointed out as being a barrier to my being a classroom teacher,
as it seemed that rearranging the desks for my ease of access was an
unreasonable burden to place on the other teachers who had to use
those classrooms. My supervising teacher also said that being unable
to "stand over" the students would make disciplining
miscreants impossible. However, even if I could stand over a
student, that's not how I would manage misbehaviour.
I actually had few behavioural
problems, other that distraction and talking; certainly nothing that
required anything more than a firm word. I was impressed with how
readily the Year 10s agreed to stop using certain words in the
classroom, and accepted my explanations for why the word was
unacceptable to me.
Other than the logistics of getting
around the school, to and from the classes, and around the classrooms
themselves, the hardest part for me has been finding the right
academic level for the class. I don't want to patronise the students,
or try to teach them something they already know, but I don't want to
go over their heads, either. I find that I have little idea how much
Year 9s should already know, and had no idea of what they had already
done in the year. On my next placement, I will find out what their
previous units have been, and try to see some of their work, in order
to guage the level that they are working at.
I definitely had some successes. My
Year 9 English unit on Whale Rider was great, and the students were
all able to write some good pieces about it, and I even managed to
bring in a reference to wheelchair rugby. If I had been there another
week I would have shown them a video of the Wheel Blacks, the NZ
wheelchair rugby team, doing their Haka.
The "not very bright",
"unteachable" Year 10s did – in spite of themselves –
pick up some knowledge about Africa and its hunger problems, and what
Live8 was about, what the G8 summit was, and who Nelson Mandela was.
When the most troublesome boy in the class called out "G8"
and then listed the eight countries, I felt like cheering!
Overall, I have learned that I can
do this, despite the restrictions from school rules,
micro-managing HODs, pre-set unit plans and ultra-conservative school
values. I feel that if I'd had longer with the 10s and could have
been a bit more flexible and hands-on, I might have had better
results. I have certainly continued thinking of ways that I could
have worked with that material in a more interesting way, and what I
might have done to work out why certain students wouldn't
participate, or were disruptive.
I have learned that I can bounce back
from bad days and recover lost ground. I must persevere through the
hard parts, because it's worth the effort. Most importantly, I
learned that I really, really want to be a high school teacher,
despite the challenges, and not pursue "other options" that
were constantly recommended to me throughout my prac.
1Study
of Society and the Environment
That started out quite discouraging but built up to lots of positive stuff. :-)
ReplyDeleteNice going! I do hope that you eventually end up in a less restrictive school, and one that expects more of their students. It's amazing how completely the teacher's opinion of a student determines how that student turns out.
ReplyDeleteSounds like you're going to make a great teacher!
Dale, I started out quite discouraged, as a lot of the negative stuff hit me in the first week, but I did get to extract lots of positives from it. I am looking forward to my next prac!
ReplyDeleteDale, I started out quite discouraged, as a lot of the negative stuff hit me in the first week, but I did get to extract lots of positives from it. I am looking forward to my next prac!
ReplyDelete